Let's talk about sex
If we want change, if we want a different culture, a society where the ego isn't calling the shots but that is an expression of sacred unity and rich diversity & creativity, than we have to be willing to look into the deep structures that keep things as they are now.
Sexuality is one of the deepest structures in ourselves and in our culture. It is in some sense still a taboo, it seems to be the sacred cow that very few people want to be objective about. Objective? About sex? Now that's a taboo! Maybe even more so here in Holland because, hey, all those hookers here in Amsterdam are making a living aren't they? Could that be only from tourists? I don't think so.
I am not saying sex is bad, oh no! I just want to open up the subject. I think in Dutch culture the relationship men and women have with sex is defining the relationship we have with each other. And that is culture, isn't it?
To me sexuality always seemed to have to do with being free, successful, wanted and alive. I am considered reasonably attractive and I could usually ‘get' the woman I liked. But the more I got interested in spiritual freedom, the more I started to notice my lack of freedom in this area. I started to experience my relationship to sex as a form of slavery that made me weak and dependent.
Almost three years ago, mainly because at the time my marriage wasn't working out, I decided to become celibate. Guided by my teacher Andrew Cohen I took a vow to abstain from sexual activity for at least a year. As a result of that I slowly started to see things differently over the past three years; I began to see that sex doesn't necessarily make you happy. Granted, it is pleasurable, and sexuality and tenderness between people can be a beautiful thing, but what started to draw my attention was the joy of not being bound, the freedom and dignity of not being in the state of a beggar waiting for the next sexual ‘gift'.
I realized a week ago that in the past, when I would be in love with a woman and it would be reciprocal, what was the most fulfilling about that experience wasn't being in relationship with her, or my feelings for her, nor her feelings for me; the deepest, most fulfilling part of the experience was the absence of wanting. As a result of feeling that this person was ‘the one' for me, I temporarily did not want someone or something else! Looking back I see that, even when I had no involvement in any form of spirituality, I loved peace more than I loved her!
So now it is starting to dawn on me that I do not need sex, or a woman, to be happy and feel whole. It is quite a discovery to find the kind of fullness, that we usually look for in the area of sexuality and relationship, in our own self! To realize that there is no hole that needs to be filled, that literally nothing is missing, ever. It convinced me that, for relationships between men and women to work out, both parties need to stop looking for fulfilment and completion in the other, and realize the fullness that is already in each of us. And I can see how a radically different culture would be the result of this.
On February 13, I will start teaching the introductory course on evolutionary enlightenment in Amsterdam, click here to see a 4 minute video with impressions from the previous courses.

Help




well thought through! sex is one of many ways we try to complete ourselves, but a very important ones - the advertisers know this well! see my blog post today on friendship, a good complement to your words here (though I wrote before reading, I am interested to see the links)
Great Arjan, what about than to full GIVE to the other ? And the other is GIVING full, too???That is what we call in the Diamond Approach the Personal Essence, only this realisation allows to be in full and complete contact with the other person, even FOR the other person, no narcissism inbeetween..to forget myself and BE the other…if two ore more people are in this realization we WILL have enlightened communication…for sure…the missing is always not resolved narcisstic shadow issues of withdrawel or grandiosity…and even that would not be a problem for aware people because there are constantly learning..to love and give even deeper AND to really care for each other…when the witness finally breaks into being..thanks for your comment, just saw it…Greetings to Amsterdam..would love to sit with you and see how it works…:):), EROS and AGAPE…Donata
It seems that in our culture we are conditioned to look at sex as some kind of closure. On many occassions when there is a 'click' between 2 human beings, over a period of time (or not) the thrill of 'being connected' needs to be followed up by sex. The question is: why do we need this closure? What do we seek in this closure? Could the answer be as simple as that even in sex we seek completion outside ourselves, a confirmation of the connection?
I tend to think that it is much more complex. Just to name an example: when being involved in a relationship it can be used as a mean to control the other person. As in: ”I don't like what you did to me, so you can't have sex with me'. This weapon of control seems to work best with women :) The weapon of control of men on the other hand seems to be more about: ”proof to me that you are my wife or girlfriend (proof your commitment to our relationship)”.
For sure, there is a lot to think about which relationship we have to sex in our lives………
thanks arjen for sharing your enbrightened journey,
i experience things much alike … i think the sex theme is a product from a pseudo identity syndrome that is mediated because of free trade (mis/s)understandings.
yesterday on the weekly salon we were informed about the phi-facelift …
did you hear of that phenomenal product (thinking)?
cheers, s' ace